tour de france blood doping
Lance Armstrong was legtimate?
I am not an expert in cycling, but I am amazed at Lance Armstrong – is a legend because of the seven (count 7) tour France wins, after battling testicular cancer. But there are so many cynics of his, and cycling as a sport that say the measures of handling and blood doping and that the results can not be trusted because half the competitors are on drugs. Do you think Armstrong was legitimate-a monster with levels naturally high resistance or just another drug cheat?
Armstrong probably was clean, but her illness was reduced to the point where he could recover and reach the perfect setting for a cyclist – other drivers can not do something. She was about to waste away in the chemo. " He lost his upper body strength he had developed through years of swimming and triathlete competetion as a child, then recovered and developed in his legs and heart by the use of steroids were allowed by the UCI because of his illness – other drivers would be banned. Having said that, he had a natural gift. big heart, lungs, and a natural ability to make against lactic acid. His VO2 natural that they have put up there with the best, but not the elite. In my opinion he is the best Tour rider of all time but not the best cyclist of all time – has specialized in the Tour, focusing their training to her alone, instead Mercx and have won five Tours + countless classics one day and other stage races.
Vinokourov – fails Tour doping test (www.deronde.nl.tt)
