Archive

Posts Tagged ‘tour_de_france’

tour de france ventoux

September 30th, 2010 The Bike Nut No comments

tour de france ventoux

2009 Tour de France – Mont Ventoux Stage 20

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Linkter

tour de france stages 2008

September 21st, 2010 The Bike Nut No comments

tour de france stages 2008
Does anyone know the exact starting and end points of the 2008 Tour de France stages?

I know what cities will be in, but I need an exact point, as an address or a specific benchmark. Please provide information for many of the start or end points as you can find. A link is usually not good because it has its own street address. And please do not respond if you are unsure of an exact point. Thanks!

Yes but I forgot … I'll be back when I remember … or when you post the same question again.

Tour De France 2008 Stage 10 Hautacam part 2

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Linkter

tour de france dopers

September 13th, 2010 The Bike Nut No comments

tour de france dopers
Cycling SI really want to clean is to act, would not grant amnesty to those who confess to cheating?

It's crazy that Riis has the balls to admit to doping, and has its Tour de France entitled stripped from him. Meanwhile, drug spineless as Ullrich, Armstrong, Indurain, Pantani and stay with their titles. I guess the Tour wants to send the message that you need to cheat, and do not have the integrity to win.

Amnesty would only allow confessed drug addicts to continue to compete without penalty (no suspension), but rightly, IMO must rescind their victories. LeMond has been dating? Pantani is the only on your list that was ever proven to be a junkie. Ullrich – the jury is still as far as doping, there is no real proof, however, and no evidence or even argument that was doped when he won the TDF. Indurain, no argument, no suspicion (except the LeMond), no positive evidence. Armstrong – simply by French vendatta and Canadian Dick Pound. The only indication of something bad were the experimental study carried out by the hacks LNDD eat cheese. Newsflash – the test is used to implicate Armstrong '99 tour was not accepted. Why? because the test kept giving too many false positives. The cast for proof of age, which showed armstrong clean. Cycling towarding go a long way to clean up your image if you want to get rid of that loudmouth wit and a half pounds and revoke the license LNDDs. There are plenty of other IOC qualified laboratories that do not have a cycling program against a tabloid media outlet (Le'Equippe) quidproquo obviously in agreement.

Stone the Dopers!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Linkter